4 to go.Link

ARIA
Assigned Responsible Intent Accountable
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit

War Illegal From Existence
WIFE
WISE
War Is Satanic Evil
as U will

HIECER
Human Inherently Emotional Cause Effect Reactor
Man Inherently Smarter Sex
MISS

oops
Omission
Political Religious Illusion Charlatan Kayfabe
media inciting
Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss

8/22/18
Dr. Richard D Wolff – Socialism In America
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXNrVaJJfHA>

MONSANTO

Rape 13

S.O.B.
Smorgasbord Of Beliefs
Kaleidoscopic Ricochet Inevitable Collision Karma Yaw
KRICKY
JeZeus Christ

DR
Deranged Righteous
Sense In Common Kleptocracy
SICK
PIGS
Personal Interest Groups Subterfuge
Mental Retards
MR

5/19/18
Corey Goode April 19 2018 — HUMAN TRAFFICKING — David Wilcock
2018
 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p45NxbUWw8Q>

3/24/18
Pete Santilli and the Assassination of the U.S. Constitution
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6KGyjQi4cU>


ST
Sanity Transcendental

Humane-IT-y Co-op

Knowable Never Tried En mass

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

Divine Simplicity
vs
Deep State 6
ESP
6
Degrees Of Separation
DOS

1 law of 3
Humane-IT-y (Spirit Force Law) Rule of Law
Stringently Enforced Eh!!!
SEE
Divine Simplicity
That’s All Folks

Damn
Gotta get the Bugs In … Not Out Sequestered Eh

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

1/4/17
This New US Weapon can END THE WORLD in 30 MIN 🔫
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM1g5P2xCYY>
Gone!!!

Replaced

8/16/16
Top SECRET US Ballistic Missiles that can END the World in 30 Minutes
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkGgFU-9z3I>

Let’s see someone top that eh!!!
God Wannabee
Blow us to Kingdom Come

Atomic United Tranquility Obit
AUTO
Together Eternal Long Last
TELL
william
???
Wom

Let us thank God will require nothing
Upon Arrival
Having spent all getting there!!!


Vault Evidence Till Obit
VETO

https://www.scribd.com/document/357009198/State-Secret-Privilege-Freedom-Info-Privacy-and-Transparency-Act
Evidence that would find the Guv Repugnant
Illegal
God And Guv
GAG
Order
Trust

Who the balls 2 say 911 an inside Falls
OJ TASK
Obstruct Justice Truth And Source Kill
Bar 2 Bar
Justice

Shadow Guv
SG
Stolen Goods

Arrest Repo Triage
ART
Spirit Science
ID
Intended Divvy-up
Debt incurred
DTS
Devoid Trust Spirit
Theirs

Fiduciary Responsibly Accountable Nefarious Kink
Banksters Interest Breach Logistics Equilibrium
13
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis
AI
Artificial Intelligence

DTs
Doublethink
Left Right
Die-ode
13
Diode

SOUL
Spirit Of Universal Law
GU
God Universe
One Family
of
13

SOL
Spirit Of Law
AWL
Abrogates Warmonger Law
De-facto Occult Appropriation
DOA
Dead Onset Antiquity

POT U
Pirates Of The Universe
Usurper Serpents
US
SG
Shadow Guv

1 for the Money 2 for the Show
1 law of 3
to get ready

Equal Protection And Benefit of the Law
Right to A Fair Trial
Fair Tax Funded
Health Care

Criminal Law
It is presumed all persons
(Elected Government Personnel and Public)
are innocent in of and with the
Spirit
S
ESS
Epitome Simplistic Sanity
(Fixed Invisible hence untouchable by MOB mind or body)
At such time reasonable evidence suggesting any person
(Elected Government Personnel or Public)
are not in of and with IT the aforementioned
Spirit
is presented to the policing authority of jurisdiction
that upon receipt the policing authority
shall conduct an exhaustive investigation
arresting and filing the appropriate charges
in the People’s Court of jurisdiction
as the evidence warrants

People’s Court
Legal System
Independent Judiciary People’s Elect
Department Of Justice
Judge
People’s Prosecuting Attorney People’s Defense Attorney
Intent To determine The Truth
Guilty or not of alleged charges
and
reference any and all additional possible offenses
surfaced in due process

Whereas due regard applied to the maintenance of the
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit
Where the environment as a whole can be deemed
In of and with the said
Spirit
Of sane legal certainty
Within the realm of Sane Presumption
The Assigned Responsibly Accountable to maintain
IT
that way

On Line Complaints system must be so established
Interactive
Independent Judiciary
(Public Legal Education System)
There for all to See and Intelligently Interact
ID
Interdependent Dependence

Intent
To deter criminal Element
180
adverse to the present system

designed to
deter presumed innocent
Self Serve
from deterring present rampant criminal element
Public Criminal Element
by example
PEG
Purported Elected Government

https://www.scribd.com/doc/145588734/Bar-to-Bar-Justice-Causes-Eccentric-to-Saddle-Up-to-the-Bar

Invisible Hand
Toupee
2P
Pick Pocket
MONSANTO

Hang in there Lord … I’ll get some Help!!!

To United Nations

So Help Me God
Been there done That!!!

CLAWS
Civil Law At Will System
Should be dealt with on line
In similar manner

Due Regard
DTS
Deterrence Treacherous Serpents
Cause Effect CE Cost Effective
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit
Intent

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

PUPIL-ATION
Must have an
Up
to speed
TRUSTED
World News System

Then and only then can we BELIEVE with reasonable conclusion
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit
Alive And Well
Consistent with Rule of Law Legal Certainty
Equity
Equal Protection And Benefit

Of course this just a tentative rough draft
POGO
Provision Of Gist Omnipresence
SOUL
Spirit Of Universal Law

SOL: Spirit Of Law

Due Process
So Many Evils
SME
Silent Majority Evolve
Shouting 4 God Sake
IV
Infrasonic Vibrations

Solar Ghost 13
4th Wall
???
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105694093/RCMP-Sarge-States-Apparently-I-Thought-Were-Actually-Going-to-Investigate-Government-Corruption-as-Per-Complaint

What’s Going On!!!

Humungous change underway!!!

Finally
The
1
Conducive to ST Sane Tranquility
aka
Humane-IT-y
co-op

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense
Pupil-ation
2

certainty of belief

???
Siamese Temples 4th Wall

Holism not to be mistaken with negative – Holism

God – Wikipedia 

God has been conceived as either personal or impersonal.
In theism,
God is the creator and sustainer of the universe,
while in deism,
God is the creator,
but not the sustainer,
of the universe.
In pantheism, God is the universe itself.

In atheism, God is not believed to exist, while God is deemed unknown or unknowable within the context of agnosticism.
God has also been conceived as the source of all
moral obligation,
and the
“greatest conceivable existent”.[3]
Many notable philosophers have developed arguments for and against the existence of God.[8]

BS
Political Religious Science
PRS

Whatever deemed the populace wants to hear to gain
Front
BS
Bait Switch
PIOUS
Profit Intention Opulent Unscrupulous Scandalized
BS
Backroom Settlements
PS
Populace Screw-tanized


God the Creator
People the Sustainers
Having been provided God given user friendly brains
To Harmonize with and Benefit of
His
Sacred Geometry
HMS
Higher Math Solutions
Y
Not Use Them
NUT

Ours to understand and flow with
AI
As Intended
maintaining
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit
Secure

United Perception Solidarity
UPS
Ultimate Potential Synchronize
SS
Spirit Science

More Study Less Work More Play
Equity Pay

Roman Empire RE Reverse Engineers
Soldiers Die
Warring 4 Rothschild
Banksters
HI
IH
Invisible Hand

War is a Racket

Humans inept to provide
3
SSS
Slippery Slimy Snakes
the luxurious perversion life lusted that
Thank their God
humans
PAC
Precious As Collateral

Double Think Syndrome
DTS
2D
Duality Duelity
MAK MAK
Making A Killing Making A Killing
Council Of IX
CON
founded on kill 2 birds while stoned
FU2

god
Gold Oil Dope
Critical Think CT Child Trafficking

Depopulation Agenda

Law Society LS Self Serve
Serve Self Self Serve
EFT
Eft Slippery Snakes
Forked Tongue
Empathy reaching out 4 a raise for self … Apathetic 4 Pathetic Majority
Free Democratic Society
4
The Impoverished and their Impoverishers

When all is
SAD
Said And Done

Moral Majority
Victoria Cross
VC
Vulnerable Citizens
BS
Band-aid Support

Charter
Section 15. (1)
Equal Protection and Benefit B4 and under the law

Law Society voices support for sustainable legal aid

Tuesday, February 13

Organization: Release: Law Society of Upper Canada

TORONTO, Feb. 12 /CNW/ – The Treasurer of the Law Society of Upper

Canada, Gavin MacKenzie, today expressed the Law Society’s continuing concern over the need
for a well-funded and sustainable system of legal aid
in Ontario.

“We believe that the right of vulnerable citizens to legal assistance is an important
component of the administration of justice in a free and democratic society,” the Treasurer said.
“Since the Ontario Legal Aid Plan was founded in 1967, the Law Society has recognized that legal aid should be considered a right, not a charitable gift,
and that individuals
are equal before the law
only
if they are assured the option of legal representation.”

Since 1982 it was guaranteed to every individual and the taxpayers pay enough not to consider it a charity or anything else but a possession, personal property attached as an arm or a leg to the certainty every individual is protected from the criminal element that obviously the governments are the ultimate criminal element.

“More than a million Ontarians benefit from Legal Aid Ontario every year, many of them through our excellent clinic system”, he added. “Legal aid also helps many vulnerable Ontarians with family law, criminal law, workers’ compensation, immigration, landlord-tenant and other legal issues.” But there are still many thousands of individuals in Ontario who cannot afford legal services and do not qualify for support from the system. The income threshold is far too low – if you earn just over $13,000 a year you are too rich to qualify for legal aid. We are alarmed by the dramatic increase in the number of people who try to represent themselves in court without the benefit of legal representation or advice about their rights.
Others simply give up their right to a fair hearing.
For all of these people, access to justice is denied.

What Ontario lawyers perceived in the 1920s, what the Joint Committee expressed in the

1960s, and what many people experience first-hand in Ontario courts every day, is that

individuals are equal before the law only if they are
assured

the option of representation by counsel.
In a democratic society,everyone should be able to participate fully in

society and
have their rights protected.

Canada has an adversarial justice system that anticipates two roughly equal parties

presenting their cases before a judge in a court of law.
What happens if there is an imbalance of power between the two parties?
When an Ontarian cannot afford to hire a lawyer,
an

imbalance of power exists,
especially
when the state is one of the parties,
as in criminal law and child protection cases. Legal aid attempts to correct this imbalance by providing low-income individuals with legal representation.

The legal aid system contributes
to ensuring
the potential
for equal protection and benefit of

the law for the poor and disadvantaged in our society.

  1. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter,
    have been infringed or denied
    may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction
    to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.Law Society ActSection 8

Not guilty on declaration of insanity, the Attorney General elected representative of the Legislature as a bencher of the Law Society
not legally practicing Law

Constitution Section 52(1)
of no Force or Effect

 Not practising law or providing legal services

(8) For the purposes of this Act, the following persons shall be deemed not to be practising law or providing legal services:

  1. A person who is acting in the normal course of carrying on a profession or occupation governed by another Act of the Legislature, or an Act of Parliament, that regulates specifically the activities of persons engaged in that profession or occupation.
  2. An employee or officer of a corporation who selects, drafts, completes or revises a document for the use of the corporation or to which the corporation is a party.
  3. An individual who is acting on his or her own behalf, whether in relation to a document, a proceeding or otherwise.
  4. An employee or a volunteer representative of a trade union who is acting on behalf of the union or a member of the union in connection with a grievance, a labour negotiation, an arbitration proceeding or a proceeding before an administrative tribunal.
  5. A person or a member of a class of persons prescribed by the by-laws, in the circumstances prescribed by the by-laws. 2006, c. 21, Sched. C, s. 2 (10).

An important part of the Crown’s – and thus the Attorney General’s – responsibility
in conducting criminal prosecutions
is
associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest
– which includes not only
the community as a whole
and
the victim,
but
also the accused.
The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

Constitution Act, 1982
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the
Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law
(Human Equals) Spirit Force Law (Rule of Law)

Power of the Spirit

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada – Lawyers Rules of Conduct
103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct
cannot address every situation,
and a lawyer should observe the rules
in the spirit
as well as in the letter.


Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only
to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right
not to be deprived thereof
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law
and
has the right
to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law
without discrimination
and, in particular,
without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

RUNS
Responsibly Unaccountable Nefarious Slinky

Attorney General, guardian of the public interest

  1. (1)The Attorney General for Ontario shall serve as the guardian of the public interest in all matters within the scope of this Act or having to do in any way with the practice of law in Ontario or the provision of legal services in Ontario, and for this purpose he or she may at any time require the production of any document or thing pertaining to the affairs of the Society. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (1); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (1); 2006, c. 21, Sched. C, s. 13.

Admissions
(2)  No admission of any person in any document or thing produced under subsection (1) is admissible in evidence against that person in any proceedings other than proceedings under this Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (2); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (2).

Protection of Minister

(3)  No person who is or has been the Attorney General for Ontario is subject to any proceedings of the Society or to any penalty imposed under this Act for anything done by him or her while exercising the functions of such office. R.S.O. 1990, c. L.8, s. 13 (3); 1998, c. 21, s. 7 (3).

The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/145588734/Bar-to-Bar-Justice-Causes-Eccentric-to-Saddle-Up-to-the-Bar
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113882977/Spirit-Intent-Precedence-de-Jure-Constitution-or-Romans-13-Gaming-the-System-de-Facto

4th Wall
???

Orbit Rop 13

http://www.scribd.com/doc/105694093/RCMP-Sarge-States-Apparently-I-Thought-Were-Actually-Going-to-Investigate-Government-Corruption-as-Per-Complaint

  1. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority
  2. (1) This Charter applies
    (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
    (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General’s agents
    may provide legal advice to the police,
    the ultimate decision
    whether or not to lay charges is for the police.
    Once the charge is laid
    the decision
    as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner,
    is
    for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.
    24(1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
    (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.Mulroney steals the RCMP making the Commissioner a Deputy Minister
    Prime Minister appoints the Attorney General
    Mulroney cries … gets a wrist slap … as his Attorney General
    Once the charge is laid
    the decision
    as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner,
    is
    for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

    The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

    MY EVIDENCE NOT PERMITTED

    (2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter,
    the evidence shall be excluded
    if it is established that,
    having regard to all the circumstances,
    the admission of it
    in the proceedings
    would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

    Fair Trial?
    Rule of Law Legal Certainty?
    Conflict of Interesr?Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles

    1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
      1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
      2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
      3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve.
      4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needsRule of Law
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
      The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.
      Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with,
      publicly disclosed laws,
      adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
      The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
      According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include
      a clear separation of powers,
      legal certainty,
      the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.
      The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that
      “the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use”
      GO POE
      General Over-use Proclamations Only Elusivitypublicly disclosed laws
      52. (1) The Constitution of Canada
      is
      the supreme law of Canada,
      and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution
      is,
      to the extent of the inconsistency,
      of no force or effect.As chief law officer, the Attorney General
      has a special responsibility
      to be the guardian of
      that most elusive concept – the rule of law.
      The rule of law is a well established legal principle,
      but
      hard to easily define.
      It is the rule of law that protects individuals,
      and
      society as a whole,
      from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.Legal Certainty
      ???

      Ultimately the Attorney General
      is
      accountable
      to the people of the province,
      through the Legislature,
      for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General’s position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case.
      The responsibility is to present the case fairly – not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the Attorney General’s responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law,
      is
      to assist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.
      Mongrel 1

      What’s Up!!!

      Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General

      The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister.

      One part of the Attorney General’s role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry and the Ministry’s communities of interest.

      The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as “judicial-like” and as the “guardian of the public interest”.

      Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney General.

      There are various components of the Attorney General’s role. The Attorney General has unique responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the various aspects of the Attorney General’s responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister.

      The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General Act. Section 5 states:

      The Attorney General,
      (a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council;
      (b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
      (c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario;
      (d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;
      (e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
      (f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government measures of a legislative nature;
      (g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such ministries and agency;
      (h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
      (i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;
      (j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. ”

      What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General’s roles and responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act.

      Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a))

      The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General’s overall responsibility as the independent legal advisor to the Cabinet – and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and well established in common law, statutes and tradition.

      As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept – the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.

      The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.

      In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General’s policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General’s legal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General’s policy advice has the same weight as that of other ministers.

      Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d))

      One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General’s role is the responsibility for criminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code.

      The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General’s agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney.

      It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the Minister’s criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures. The Attorney General’s responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken – and seen to be undertaken – on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen’s Attorney – not as a Minister of the government of the day.

      This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General’s alone and independent of the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General’s agents, the Crown Attorneys.

      An important part of the Crown’s – and thus the Attorney General’s – responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest – which includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.

      The responsibility is to present the case fairly – not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the Attorney General’s responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

      Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General’s position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case.

      Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General’s agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed.

      Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f))

      The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation.

      The Attorney General’s legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel’s reporting relationship to the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member’s bills.

      The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration.

      The Attorney General’s role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely, Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General’s legal opinion on legislation and choose to disregard it. The Attorney General’s role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation.

      Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d))

      In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown’s parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General’s authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake.

      This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights.

      Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))

      A key component of the Attorney General’s responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the judiciary.

      Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of judicial independence must be exercised in this area.

      As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept – the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.


      I know I Shall never see a Poem as Lovely as a Tree
      Nor a brighter Life Form
      !!!

      III
      Inform Inform Inform

      SOL: Spirit Of Law

      1 for the money
      2 for the show
      1 law of 3
      to get ready
      www.4togo.Link

      Heads Up – Avoid the FU2

 


Heads UP – Avoid the FU2OMEN
Old Money Evolves Nefariously
Old serpents never die … they just shed their skins and fly
As We Die
AWD

Truth trumps Trump
Odd Eh!!!


America Great Eh!!!
Age
ART
As Righteous Treachery

www.Romans13.Today

3/5/17
BERKELEY MARCH 4 TRUMP EXTENDED FOOTAGE (WARNING)
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PJ6jUOPn_w>

 3/5/17
Violence Erupts At Pro-Trump Rallies Across The U.S. (March 5, 2017 Headlines)
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROW7d_dy4hA>

JIG JAWS QBS

H AD HOC K

RAPE 13
God proclaimed de jure Moses front administer antithesis de facto doG

POOR
WW III Russia 911 Iraq MO

Jig Jaw Puzzle


CASKET 13

OH OH!!
Xmas in Jew Lie

NWO
The Whole Truth … Nothing But The Truth

Greed
CREED
Classified Redact Essential Evidence Destruct
Immunity Impunity
Plead 5th ot Glug One
SOW
Slap On Wrist
If necessary take the fall with a
Pardon

Bee Thing
BS
Bee Sting
Butterflies Are Free Fiduciary Legal Essence
BAFFLE
(fine print)
Heaven Straight Ahead
We got Wings
What’s Going On!!!

CNN
A Gold Mine Of
Human rights
are commonly understood as “inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being.”[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.[2] The doctrine of human rights in international practice, within international law, global and regional institutions, in the policies of states and in the activities of non-governmental organizations, has been a cornerstone of public policy around the world. The idea of human rights [3] states,
“if
the public discourse of peacetime global society can be said to have a common moral language,
it is that of human rights.”

Despite this, the strong claims made by the doctrine of human rights continue to provoke considerable skepticism and debates about the content, nature and justifications of human rights to this day.
Indeed,
the question of what is meant by a “right” is itself controversial and the subject of continued philosophical debate.[4]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/113882977/Spirit-Intent-Precedence-de-Jure-Constitution-or-Romans-13-Gaming-the-System-de-Facto

NEWS
Never Ending War Story
Loop Hole
DTS
Double Take Sting

IDI
If Declared Irrelevant
Peace All Times
PATHand
Grapevine 13

UN
Declared
War And Colonization Kleptocracy Obsolete
WACKO

To United Nations

MONSANTO

BS
Bring Straight-jackets

Et Tu, Brute?

GOI

Did the mummies think we were dummies or sum thin!!!
Like their
PG
Pecuniary God
FEE
Fiat Essence Elevator

Stalled

Pogo Stick
PS
Truth Jumps

Heads Up – Avoid the FU2
Fly By … Pamphlet Wise … War Zones

III
Inform Inform Inform

Of the Royals why I found Kate Great By Black Beauty!!!LIBERTY
Life Inherently Begins Eradicating Righteous Tyrannical Yolk

Talk about egg in face eh!!!
12/26/16
Trey Gowdy ROAST !! Elijah Cummings ‘YOUR JUST AS STUPID AS Hillary !From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLq01oh5obI>

 12/24/16WE FOUND IT !!!! Trey Gowdy KNOCKS OUT Hillary Clinton’s SECRET SPY !
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rMO7OUqXns#t=434.448166>

 12/23/16
Hillary Clinton Real Movie She Banned From Theaters Exposed
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2pY2ojWvsQ>

12/22/16
Trey Gowdy – JAIL HILLARY CLINTON | (She’s PAYING OFF CROOKED FBI AGENTS )
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j42UiqHtO8>

12/22/16
Trey Gowdy GOES NUTS !!!!! Hillary Clinton ‘WHEN I PAUSE ,THEN YOU ANSWER’ !!!
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gqKmynlP5Y>

12/22/16
Trey Gowdy Meets Hillary Clinton’s Spy
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JredjqSH1_g>

12/21/16
Trey Gowdy – ERUPTS INTO FLAMES !!!!! Barack Obama YOUR A STUPID PERSON !!
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra3pGbKK4qs>

12/21/16
Trey Gowdy – I HAVE ONE WORD FOR !!!!! Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch !!
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl2JkWVOjBA>

12/14/16
Trey Gowdy Crushes Hostile Witness & Arrogant Democrat At The Same Time
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYbEVHJvXsg>

12/13/16
Trey Gowdy Erupts On Obama Sympathizer “The President Can’t Rewrite Law’
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJaWiuAuy_k>

12/12/161
Trey Gowdy Embarrasses Constitution Thrashing Official Like A Boss
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L0MygH_UIk>

12/12/16
Trey Gowdy Finds Out Deputy AG Likes To Hide Information From Congress
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evyY4FEO_rQ>

12/9/16
TREY GOWDY: OH NO YOU DIDN’T JUST PLAY THE RACE CARD!
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjaY5Tmvmqs>

12/7/16
TREY GOWDY SLAM DUNKS Dem. CHRIS DALE: “Don’t Ever Question My Record”
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9jaoy1mgls>

 12/4/16
Trey Gowdy Owns Two Yuppie Liberal Democrat Congressmen on Second Amendment
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAEmPoVw6s8>

 11/29/16
THE ONE TREY GOWDY VIDEO NO AMERICAN SHOULD MISS ~ PROTECTING AMERICA
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGOVtzZ_LWw>

11/28/16
Trey Gowdy goes harambe on Hillary Clinton goon for lying to the American people
From <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIbZvFVmOeU>

Facts must have root 2 take root God Coherency
“Catch 22”
must have semblance 2 catch doG chase tail

HEY
Anti-Dog ma

Mongrel 1

What’s Going On!!!

 Echo 4 Birds

Benefit Unscrupulous Treacherous Traitors Snuff
BUTTS
FINIS
Fun Is Nice In Sun

Less work
and
Like that!!!

CASKET 13

FOLLOW
Fruit Of Life Longevity On Wizardry
Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

System Conducive Intention Essence Natural Cause Effect
SCIENCE

So Many Evils
SME
Silent Majority Evolve
Shouting 4 God Sake

So Many Evils
SME
Silent Majority Evolve
Shouting 4 God Sake

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.